Hotels aren’t being “disrupted” by AI. They’re being tempted by it.
Tempted to automate the messy, human work of hospitality because the output looks clean on a screen: perfectly worded messages, instant replies, “efficient” service.
But guests don’t experience hospitality as efficiency. They experience it as care.
And that’s the risk: AI can make your operation look smarter while making your brand feel colder. The most important question isn’t how fast can we deploy AI? It’s where should we refuse to use it?
Because in hospitality, using AI thoughtlessly doesn’t just create operational noise. It quietly chips away at trust.
When AI Misses the Mark
Let’s start with where AI struggles.
You’ve probably seen this play out. A guest leaves a frustrated review:
“The front desk staff rolled their eyes when I asked for extra towels.”
The AI-generated response is grammatically perfect. Polished. Corporate.
And emotionally invisible. Efficiency replaced empathy.
The issue isn’t that AI wrote the reply incorrectly. It’s that AI doesn’t feel the nuance behind that interaction. It doesn’t understand what that moment meant to the guest or what it says about culture, training, or tone.
In hospitality, context matters. Emotion matters. Brand nuance matters.
AI struggles when:
-
The situation requires empathy and emotional intelligence
-
The data is incomplete or not digitized
-
The decision impacts brand identity
-
Exceptions are more common than patterns
This is where we get into trouble: asking AI to do the wrong job.
Where AI Actually Excels
Now the part people get right: AI can be incredible when you give it the right work.
AI works best when it’s:
That’s why pricing and marketing are such strong use cases.
Take pricing. A 60-room boutique hotel in a seasonal destination is dealing with thousands of variables across the year; booking windows, length of stay, compression nights, shoulder season softness, and countless searches that never convert.
Humans do what we’ve always done: we form data-driven intuition.
-
“We sold out too fast that weekend.”
-
“Midweek is always soft.”
-
“Guests won’t pay over $325 here.”
AI sees what humans can’t see at scale: the precise point where demand becomes price-resistant, how sensitivity changes by booking window, and how length of stay affects rate tolerance during high-demand periods.
Same story in marketing. Humans notice anecdotes.
-
“Promotional subject lines got higher opens.”
-
“Property images beat lifestyle images.”
-
“Length-of-stay promos beat % off.”
AI can test across huge volume and find measurable lift, like performance differences tied to subject line length, seasonal language, timing precision, and segment framing.
AI isn’t replacing good operators here. It’s giving them better instruments.
A Simple Framework for Evaluating AI Use Cases
Over time, I’ve found most AI decisions in hospitality come down to three tenets. If you can’t answer “yes” to all three, AI probably isn’t the right tool.
If the answer to all three is “yes,” AI is likely a strong fit.
1. Is the Input Fully Digitized?
AI depends on structured, reliable data.
Booking pace, search activity, campaign performance, historical demand — these are structured, trackable data points that can be measured. Guest frustration during a renovation? The nuance in how you apologize? Not so much.
If the signal isn’t clean and digital, AI will struggle.
2. Is Success Clearly Measurable?
Can the system independently evaluate whether it’s performing well?
In pricing, we have RevPAR, ADR, occupancy, revenue lift.
In marketing, we have conversion rate, CPC, ROAS.
Clear feedback loops allow AI to learn and improve.
If outcomes are subjective (“Did that feel on-brand?”) humans must stay firmly in control.
3. Does AI Provide a Meaningful Advantage?
This is the most overlooked question.
AI should only be deployed when it:
Not because it’s trendy. Not because someone on a panel said you “need an AI strategy.”
If AI doesn’t create meaningful leverage, it doesn’t belong in the workflow.
Why Humans Still Stay in the Loop
The most effective operators don’t treat AI as autopilot. They treat it as a co-pilot.
AI can handle:
Humans must handle:
-
Judgment
-
Context
-
Guest experience
-
Risk tolerance
-
Property identity
The winning model isn’t machine versus operator. It’s a feedback loop; AI learning from real outcomes while humans shape guardrails and long-term direction.
When done well, AI doesn’t remove the human touch. It creates more space for it.
The Real Risk Isn’t Using AI. It’s Using It Thoughtlessly.
Hospitality doesn’t need less AI.
It needs better boundaries.
So before you deploy the next tool, ask:
-
Is this a pattern problem or a people problem?
-
Will AI amplify our expertise or flatten our voice?
-
Are we protecting the moments that should stay unmistakably human?
AI is exceptional at processing signals.
Humans are exceptional at meaning.
Hotels that win will be the ones that use both.